The non-existent enemy and following fools
In the fantasy world of learn-to-read books of my long-ago primary school days I remember the story of Chicken Licken who had the misfortune to… Read More »The non-existent enemy and following fools
In the fantasy world of learn-to-read books of my long-ago primary school days I remember the story of Chicken Licken who had the misfortune to… Read More »The non-existent enemy and following fools
Towards the end of more than forty years in front line journalism I became increasingly aware of the development of an informal duality of citizenship… Read More »Separatism in New Zealand: Part Five; Ownership of Fresh Water and Beaches and consultation
Towards the end of more than forty years in front line journalism I became increasingly aware of the development of an informal duality of citizenship… Read More »Separatism in New Zealand: Part Four; Maori in Central and Local Government
Towards the end of more than forty years in front line journalism I became increasingly aware of the development of an informal duality of citizenship… Read More »Separatism in New Zealand: Part Three; Treaty Partnership
Towards the end of more than forty years in front line journalism I became increasingly aware of the development of an informal duality of citizenship… Read More »Separatism in New Zealand: Part Two; Cultural and traditional harvest of natural and exotic resources
From the time I started in journalism in 1963 I have seen a number of changes in the social structure of New Zealand and not… Read More »Separatism in New Zealand: The Insidious Development of Separatism in New Zealand: Part One
On Friday February 11, 2022 I tuned into a Zoom meeting hosted by Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) to discuss Treaty of Waitangi partnerships in… Read More »Separatism
In the first two decades of the twenty first century among the most misused words in New Zealand were racism, apartheid and separatism. Sometimes they were applied incorrectly or used interchangeably and too often they were used to stifle debate or denigrate people who dared to question a new political development